Alex Rodriguez trade made waves throughout professional sports — and overshadowed a Lightning-hot Bolts team in the national media — as his huge contract shifted from the Texas Rangers to the poster-boys of gluttony, the New York Yankees. The Yankees payroll this season is a fifth of a Billion Dollars and extra spending isn’t frowned upon by George Steinbrenner.
This is the bane of both Major League Baseball and the National Hockey League.
I won’t cry too many tears for the owners of the NHL, who have shown incompetence in their dealings and planning and marketing more than once, but when one team has a blank check to invest in players — it goes to the players heads and goes to the Players Union’s head. Sound economic models be damned — if this team can afford to pay a player this sum,.there must be plenty of money for owners to invest.
The warped logic of this is that the NHL is not the NFL, it’s not even the NBA. It is loved by North Americans from two countries but it is no economic juggernaut that can afford every team to pay players whatever they ask.
Though the high-spending Rangers didn’t achieve greatness by pulling out their billfold, they have hurt teams in the league by setting standards of pay rates for marquee players without so much as an afterthought what it does to the league. With no forced cap on spending, they — being in North America’s #1 media market — can spend whatever their heart desires and every other team in the league must play catchup.
I’m for a free market system - but something needs to be done so that one team does not horde everyone, and does not overspend to bring in any name that they chose. Of course, free agency and salary arbitration need to be fixed too to give the players a reason why they should even entertain the thought of a Collective Bargaining Agreement with a Salary Cap installed. A cap is a much more effective system than the “Salary Tax” installed by Major League Baseball which has failed to stop overspending by baseball clubs (the Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees are perfect examples). A cap, though it restricts the market as to where one can sign and for how much, helps the game remain economically plausible…. And what does an improved, economically stable and entertaining NHL do to a Salary cap? It raises the cap — lifting the owners boats as well as the players boats, so to speak — by bringing in more money that can be invested.
Of course, I expect Gary Bettman to screw the pooch negotiating this deal and Bob Goodenow to screw the sport by not wavering.
And in some ways, you can thank Alex Rodriguez for all of this. Different sport — but same failed economic system.
5 Comments until now
I fail to see why the NHL needs a salary cap. Teams like Ottawa and Tampa are the top of the league while the Rangers languish out of the playoffs.
The NHL’s system of restricted free agency until 31 is the best in pro sports. It allows any franchise to build a contender while keeping their players for over a decade if they so choose.
Is there a team in the NHL that is the equivalent of the New York Yankees? And even so, the Yankees don’t win the World Series every year and a good portion of their success is a result of their ability to develop young players.
You don’t seem to grasp what I’ve been saying and that means I failed in the attempt to say it…
By a team — any team — showing they can throw out huge checks to players with no constraint on their payroll, it gives players a big head and thus increases salaries league wide.
Ottaw and Tampa Bay, Minnesota and Anaheim — all playoff teams is a correct statement, but with players that are RFA’s demanding mroe and more due to their production that is similar to what an UFA is getting, salaries continue to explode.
The Free Agent system itself is something that is broke — Bob Goodenow harps about a free maket system and capitalism and yet no one is free until 31. While this logic might be blessed by fans, it’s not fair to the players.
I’m the LAST guy that should be blessing younger UFA’s — the Lightning’s core of Vincent Lecavalier, Brad Richards, Pavel Kubina and other young stars, could certainly jump to a team willing to spend to bring in talent (read: Rangers - who would be wise to start investing in young talent instead of throwing together a bunch of aging stars) — but the current system is in fact unfair to players.
I’m also not one to back ownership gorups, but after aforementioned Ottawa, Buffalo and Pittsburgh went bankrupt in the past few years, you can see there are problems with the economics of this game and part of that is exploding salaries.
RFA’s get what the market will bear which is usually forced by arbitration and its threat. Teams aren’t going around paying players more then they have to. And if they are, they’ve got no one to blame but themselves (ahem, Milbury, ahem, Yashin).
What an unrestricted free agent makes has no bearing on a restricted free agent unless the RFA is willing to give up years where he would be eligible for UFA status.
Salaries have not exploded in recent years. Salaries have leveled off in the past few years. There isn’t a player who entered the league under the current CBA that makes $7M a season.
Why is the current system unfair to players? Do they not make enough money because of it? The current system delays players getting their payday until they are past their prime. That allows any team in the league to compete. If players were actually paid what they are worth then the Rangers and Maple Leafs would have a huge advantage.
The only thing the problems in Ottawa, Buffalo and Pittsburgh demonstrate is that there are problems in the league if you try to buy the team purely on debt without any capital (Ottawa), embezzle funds from your companies (Buffalo) or completely mortgage the future to pay for the present (Pittsburgh).
Jarome Iginla makes $7 million, and he entered the league in 1995-96. Bertuzzi makes $6.8, and his contract extention, signed under this CBA, will push him over $7 mil. Forsberg never played an NHL game until after the CBA, and he makes $11 million.
The salary explosion did not happen at the top end. The explosion centred around rookies, some of whom end up making $3-4 million a year after all bonusses are counted, and on the lower tier guys. A goon like Laraque making $1.3 million?
The Iginlas, Bertuzzis and Forsbergs deserve their coin. The middle of the road players making several million a year do not. This is where the problem with salaries lie.
[...] Maybe John Romano at the St. Petersburg Times read a piece I published last year regarding Alex Rodriguez deal to New York…. [...]